Post-communist land use changes related to urban sprawl in the Romanian metropolitan areas

Author: , , , , and
Key words: , , , ,
Issue: Volume 6, Issue 1, 2012

Abstract


The landscape pattern of the Romanian urban system has experienced significant transformations as a result of the rapid and irreversible changes undertaken after the fall of the communism. In Romania almost 34% of its total population are living in metropolitan areas. The paper is aiming to analyse the landscape-related challenges land-use/land-cover changes in the Romanian metropolitan areas in relation with the main factors involved in the patterns of change: demographic, political and natural. Based on the investigation of relevant cartographic supports of the last 20 years, the authors are making use of different GIS methods in order to conduct a series of complex analysis of the spatial-temporal landscape challenges. The paper will mainly focus on four metropolitan areas considered as case-studies: the capital-city (Bucharest) and the three functional metropolitan areas (Oradea, Iaşi and Constanţa), each metropolitan area is facing different patterns and causes of change.

Full text


Permalink (doi)



Authors Affiliations


Ines Grigorescu*(a), Bianca Mitrică (a), Gheorghe Kucsicsa (a), Elena-Ana Popovici (a), Monica Dumitraşcu (a), Roxana Cuculici (b)
(a) Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania
(b) Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
*Corresponding author. Email: inesgrigorescu@yahoo.com

References


Bălteanu, D & Grigorescu, I 2006, ‘The impact of Changing land Use upon the Environment in the Metropolitan Area of Bucharest. Preliminary Considerations’, Romanian Review of Regional Studies – Journal of the Centre for Regional Geography, II, Cluj-Napoca.
Bălteanu, D & Popovici, EA 2010, ‘Land use changes and land degradation in post-socialist Romania’, Romanian Journal of Geography, vol. 54 (2), Bucharest, Romania, pp. 95-107.
Bălteanu, D, Popescu, M & Urşanu, (Popovici) EA, 2005, ‘Land use in Romania under the Transition to the Market Economy’, Analele Universităţii Bucuresti, Anul LIV, pp. 99-112.
Bălteanu, D, Popescu, M & Urşanu, AE 2004, ‘Land tenure and relations in Romania’, in An International Encyclopedia of Land Tenure Relations for the Nations of the World, IV, The Edwin Mellen Press, ISBN Lewiston, Queenston, Lampeter, UK, 07734-65391, pp.
Bicik, I, Jelecek, L & Stepanek, V 2001, ‘Land-Use Changes and their Social driving Forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th Centuries’, Land Use Policy, 18, No. 1, pp. 65–73. [CrossRef]
Degorska, B 2004, ‘Spatial conflicts between the shaping of open spaces and the socio-economic development in the metropolitan area of Warsaw’, in András, Donát, Kovacs (eds), New Aspects of Regional Transformation and the Urban-Rural Relationship, Centre for Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pecs, Hungary.
Donnelly, S 2010, ‘Land-use portfolios and the management of private landholdings in south-central Indiana’, Regional Environmental Change, SpringerLink, DOI:10.1007/s10113-010-0124-6. [CrossRef]
Dragotă, CS & Grigorescu, I 2010, Climatic hazards in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. The assessment of the main extreme climatic phenomena in the Bucharest municipality and its surroundings, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, ISBN 978-3-8433-6911-4, paperback, 108 p.
Eastman, JR 2006, Idrisi Andes – Guide to GIS and image processing, Manual Version 15, Clark Lab, Clark University, USA.
Erdeli, G, Cândea, M, Braghină, C, Costachi, S & Zamfir D 1999, Dicţionar de Geografie Umană, Edit. Corint, Bucureşti.
Geografia României 2005, vol. V, Edit. Academiei Române, Bucureşti.
Government Ordinance no. 53/2002 regarding the approval of the Framework Statute of the territorial-administrative units.
Grigorescu, I 2008, ‘Environmental issues in Bucharest Metropolitan Area’, Journal of The Geographical Society of Hosei University, 40, pp. 11-21, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirt, S 2008, ‘Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of Post-Socialist Peri-Urban Change’, Urban Geography, Bellwether Publishing, Ltd., 755-780
Irwin, GE 2003, Using GIS to model patterns of urban/rural land use change, Ohio Geospatial Technology Conference for Agriculture and Natural Resources Holiday Inn Worthington, Columbus, Ohio March 24-26, 2003.
Janáč, J, Jeleček, L & Chromý, P 2010, ‘LUCC in East Central and Southeast Europe post-communist countries from 1960s to the end of the 20th century and its historic-geographical roots’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica, no.2, 19-30.
Kamal-Chaoui, L & Alexis, R (eds) 2009, ‘Competitive Cities and Climate Change’, OECD Regional Development Working Papers N° 2, 2009, OECD publishing.
Kuemmerle, T, Muller, D, Griffiths, P & Rusu, M 2009, ‘Land use change in Southern Romania after the collapse of socialism’, Regional Environmental Change, SpringerLink, DOI 10.1007/s10113-008-0050-z. [CrossRef]
Law 350/2001on territory management and urbanism
Law 351/2001 to approve the National Territory Management Plan – Section IV – Settlements
Law no. 286/2006 of July 2006 amending and supplementing the Law no. 215/2001 of the local public administration.
Leetmaa, K 2008, Residential Suburbanization in the Tallin metropolitan area, Dissertation thesis, Tartu University Press, 278p.
Meyer, WB & Turner, BL II 1992, ‘Human population growth and global land-use/cover change’, Ann. Rev Ecol Syst 23:39–61. [CrossRef]
Napton, DE, Auch, RF, Headley, R & Taylor LJ 2010, ‘Land changes and their driving forces in the Southeastern United States’, Regional Environmental Change, SpringerLink, 10:37–53. [CrossRef]
Ourednicek, M 2007, ‘Differential suburban development in the Prague urban region’, Geogr. Ann., 89 B (2): 111–126.
Petsimeris, P 2002, ‘Population deconcentration in Italy, Spain and Greece: A first comparison’, EKISTIKS, the problems and science of human settlements, Defining success of the city in the 21st century, vol. 69.
Popovici, EA 2010, Piemontul Cotmeana. Dinamica utilizării terenurilor şi calitatea mediului, Editura Academiei Române, pp. 218
Popovici, EA, 2008, ‘Factorii principali ai schimbării utilizării terenurilor în România în perioada post-socialistă’, Revista geografică, T. XIV-XV – 2007-2008, Institutul de Geografie, Edit. Academiei Române, Bucureşti, pp. 123-128.
Premysl, S 2007, ‘Selected driving forces of long-term land use changes in Czechia, Man in the landscape across frontiers’, Proceedings of the IGU-LUCC Central Europe Conference.
Soler, L de Souza & Verburg, PH 2010, ‘Combining remote sensing and household level data for regional scale analysis of land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon’, Regional Environmental Change, SpringerLink.
Soós, G & Ignits, G 2003, ‘Suburbanization and Its Consequences in the Budapest Metropolitan Area’, Third EuroConference The European City in Transition, The City and the Region, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany, Supported by the European Commission.
Sykora, L & Ourednicek, M 2007, ‘Sprawling post-communist metropolis: commercial and residential suburbanisation in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic’, in: Razin, E, Dijst, M & Vazquez C (eds.), Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas, GeoJournal Library, Volume 91, 209-233. [CrossRef]
Sykora, L 2006, ‘Urban Development, Policy and Planning in the Czech Republic and Prague’, in Altrock, U, Guntner, S, Huning, S & Peters, D. (eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States. From Adjustment to Reinvention, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.
Tammaru, T, Leetmaa, K, Silm, S & Ahas, R 2009, Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the New Residential Areas around Tallinn European Planning Studies, 17/3, 423-439. [CrossRef]
Turnock, D 1998, ‘Romania’, in Turnock D (ed) Privatization in Rural Eastern Europe. The process of restitution and restructuring. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
URBAN-NET Research Anthology, 2010
van den Berg, Leo, et al. 1982, Urban Europe – A study of Growth and Decline, Pergamon Press, pp 162.

This post has already been read 3099 times!