Land cover and land use analysis of urban growth in Romania

Author:
Key words: , , , ,
Issue: Volume 6, Issue 1, 2012

Abstract


While cities appeared and disappeared during the history, and different disciplines, such as ecology and geography attempted to model the process from a systemic perspective, the growth of modern cities, particularly under the form of urban sprawl, is an important phenomenon due to its environmental and socioeconomic impacts. CORINE data allow for analyzing the growth of cities based on the changes in land cover and use. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of long-term urban growth in Romania, chosen as an example of a transition country, hypothesizing that the phenomenon is visible at the national scale. The results locate urban growth in area where the real estate boom is prominent, but its extent is masked by the small share of urban areas from the total territory. If growth is analyzed in relationship to the urban area, its magnitude becomes visible, supporting the underlying hypothesis.

Full text


Permalink (doi)



Authors Affiliations


“Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, Romania
Email: a.i.petrisor@gmail.com

References


Alpopi, C 2007, ‘Prerequisites for a sustainable model of cities development’, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, vol. 2, nr. 4, p. 1-8.
BNP, P 2008, Bucharest Property, Mid year 2008, Atisreal, Bucharest.
Botnariuc, N & Vădineanu, A 1982, Ecologie, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucharest.
Bullard, RD 2004, Environment and Morality. Confronting Environmental Racism in the United States, Switzerland, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Dumbravă, E 2005, Fenomenul downshifting – sau „dincolo“ de top management, HR-România, http://www.hr-romania.ro/articole_afis.php?artId=1604.
European Commission, 2001, Manual of concepts on land cover and land use information systems, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg.
European Environment Agency – EEA, 2006, Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge, Office for Official Publications of the Europe and Communities, Luxemburg.
Holling, CS 2004, ‘From complex regions to complex worlds’, Ecology and Society, vol. 9, nr. 1, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art11/.
Ianoş, I 2000, ‘Romanian towns: from extensive industrialisation to ruralisation?’, The Geographical Journal of Korea, vol. 34, p. 125-136.
Ianoş, I, Petrişor, AI, Stoica, VI, Sârbu, CN, Zamfir, D & Cercleux, AL 2011, ‘The different consuming of primary eco-energies and their degradation in territorial systems’, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol. 6, nr. 2, p. 251-260.
Jensen, JR 2000, Remote Sensing of the Environment. An Earth Resource Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Johnston, K, Ver Hoef, JM, Krivoruchko, K & Lucas, N 2001, Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA.
Lacaze, JP 1990, Les méthodes de l’urbanisme, Deuxième édition corigée, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Mitrea, V 2008, ‘Creşterea oraşelor’, Arhitext, nr. 4, p. 92-95.
Petrişor A.-I., (2008a), Ecologie urbană, dezvoltare spaţială durabilă şi legislaţie, Bucharest, Editura Fundaţiei România de mâine.
Petrişor, AI & Sârbu, CN 2010, ‘Dynamics of geodiversity and eco-diversity in territorial systems’, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, vol. 2, nr. 1, p. 61-70.
Petrişor, AI 2008, ‘Levels of biological diversity: a spatial approach to assessment methods’, Romanian Review of Regional Studies, vol. 4, nr. 1, p. 41-62.
Petrişor, AI 2011, Systemic theory applied to ecology, geography and spatial planning. Theoretical and methodological developments, Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.
Petrişor, AI, Ianoş, I & Tălângă, C 2010, ‘Land cover and use changes focused on the urbanization processes in Romania’, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, vol. 9, nr. 6, p. 765-771.
Popa, A & Giurcă Vasilescu L 2009, ‘The real estate investments and the financial crisis in Romania’, Finance – Challenges of the Future, vol. 8, nr. 10, p. 65-70.
Popa, N 2011, ‘Stakes in contention and mutations in the organisation of the urban and periurban space of Timişoara’, Revista Română de Geografie Politică, vol. 13, nr. 2, p. 109-132.
Salas-Olmedo H & Nogués S 2010, ‘The land use and transport relationship in peripheral areas: policy integration based on case studies’, General Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Transport Research Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
Stan, AI 2009, Peisajul periferiilor urbane: revitalizarea peisageră a zonelor periferice, Editura Universitară Ion Mincu, Bucharest.
Stan, AI 2010, ‘Cultură urbană – peisaj cultural urban’, Urbanism. Arhitectură. Construcţii, vol. 1, nr. 1, p. 19-24.
Strauss, EJ & Neamţu, B 2006, ‘Policy tools for addressing urban sprawl: Urban growth boundaries (II)’, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 16, p. 136-153.

This post has already been read 1505 times!