New trajectories of post-socialist residential mobility in Bucharest

Author: , , and
Key words: , , ,
Issue: Volume 8, Issue 1, 2014

Abstract


Over the post-socialist period, residential mobility processes were very intense and took place on large areas. Flow intensity led to the emergence of new spatial and functional realities and created new relationships within the affected areas. During all this period, Bucharest’s metropolitan area was shaped by the spatial mobility of the city dwellers, as well as by the change of their social and residential aspirations. The majority of those who were registered as movers in Bucharest were actually residents of Bucharest (they only changed their domicile) and the share of people coming to the city from elsewhere has increased constantly over the last decade. Except for the early 1990s, a period when residential legal status was pending clarification, migrations from peri-urban area, especially from Ilfov County, to Bucharest had a low intensity. Situation is quite different in terms of moving out of Bucharest, to the communes and towns of Ilfov County, located in close proximity, which have been continuously increasing values. The correlation between housing stock features (real estate supply) and the demand of new dwellings (emphasized by the residential trajectories) prove both that current mobility flows taking place at this time in Bucharest are segmented based on economic-spatial criteria and that Markov chains are functional.b>

Full text


Permalink (doi)



Authors Affiliations


Bogdan Suditu(a)*, Liliana Dumitrache(a), Daniel Vârdol(b), Daniel-Gabriel Vâlceanu(a, c)
(a) Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Romania
(b) National Institute of Statistics, Bucharest, Romania
(c) National Institute for Research and Development in Constructions, Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development URBAN-INCERC, Bucharest, Romania
* Corresponding author. Email: b_suditu@yahoo.fr

References


REFERENCES

Abramo, P 1997, Marché et ordre urbain : du chaos à la théorie de la localisation résidentielle, L’Harmattan, Paris, 158p.

Bacaïni, B 2000, ̒Projet de mobilité et cadre de vie̕, Données Urbaines MF Mattei & D Pumain (coord.), vol. 3, pp. 91-111.

Bassand, M & Brulhardt, MC 1980, Mobilité spatiale, Georgi, Saint-Saphorin.

Bonetti, M 1994, Habiter. Le bricolage imaginaire de l’espace, EPI, Paris.

Courgeau, D 1988, Méthodes de mesure de la mobilité spatiale : migrations internes, mobilité temporaire, navettes, INED, Paris.

Courgeau, D, Lelievre, E & Wolber, O 1998, ̒Reconstruire des trajectoires de mobilité résidentielle̕, Economie & Statistique, no. 316-317, pp. 163-173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/estat.1998.2655

Dumitrache, L & Suditu, B 2000, ̒Deplacements, mobilite residentielle, migrations – une approche theorique̕ in Regionalism and Integration-Culture,Space and Development, pp. 157-165, Editura Brumar, Timișoara. Gavriș, A 2011, Mari habitate urbane din Bucureşti – studiu de geografie urbană, Editura Universitară, București.

Knox, P & Pinch, S 2000, Urban Social Geography. An Introduction (4th edition), Prentince Hall, Prenson.

Nae, M 2007, ̒La taille des logements, densités élevées et attachement résidentiel – facteurs limitatifs de l’habitat urbain bucarestois̕, Human Geographies – Journal of Research in Human Geography, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 114 -124

Nae, M 2008, ̒Facteurs limitatifs de l’habitat urbain bucarestois lors de l’époque (post)transitionnelle à l’impact visible sur la qualité de vie̕, Analele Universităţii din Bucureşti, Seria Geografie, an LV-2006, pp. 63-74.

Nae, M 2009, Bucureşti – dezvoltare urbană şi calitatea vieţii, Editura Universitară, București.

Noica, N 2003, Între istorie şi realitate. Politici de locuire în România, Editura Maşina de scris, Bucureşti.

Suditu, B 2009, ‘Urban sprawl and residential mobilities in the Bucharest area – reconfiguration of a new residential geography’, Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, vol. 4, no.2, pp. 79-93.

This post has already been read 11406 times!