Sustaining creative kampong through circular economy: a study on Binong Jati’s knitting industry
Abstract: Waste management is a considerable urban challenge which remains difficult to resolve. To address inadequate waste management, the widespread introduction of circular economy principles can function as a viable solution, particularly in developing countries with potential for economic growth through creative villages (Creative Kampong). This study aims to support the sustainability of the knitting industry centre in Binong Jati by minimising waste problems through the implementation of circular economy principles. Issues such as waste accumulation in Greater Bandung Urban areas negatively impact the environment and community well-being in Bandung, affecting Creative Kampong Binong Jati. This research studies the implementation of the circular economy to enhance the sustainability of Creative Kampong Binong Jati. Utilising a qualitative method and the 9R strategy to measure the level of circular economy implementation, alongside environmental indicators to assess sustainability. The study concludes that the adoption of a circular economy solution has reached the highest level of the 9R strategy, although further improvements in implementation and community knowledge are needed. The data collection method includes a literature review of similar case studies, interviews with creative industry stakeholders, and direct observation. Most environmental indicators have been met, indicating the village’s overall environmental sustainability. Recommendations include increasing the frequency of urban waste collection, raising community awareness about waste management, more routine socialisation of the Kang Pisman (Reduce, Separate, Utilise) programme, and promoting supply chains that support sustainability from local governments. Implementing these recommendations is expected to support the sustainability of Creative Kampong Binong Jati comprehensively.
Full text .pdf
Permalink (doi) http://dx.doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2025.192.8
Authors Affiliations
Tazkia Rosa Az-Zahra*, Kelvin Narada Gunawan, Raihan Firdaus, Adiwan Fahlan Aritenang
School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Email: tazkiarosaa@gmail.com
References
Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, Part B, 78(3), 243–261.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Kecamatan Batununggal Dalam Angka.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bandung. (2021, March 23). Produksi sampah menurut jenisnya di Kota Bandung, 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Bandung.
Becattini, G. (1990). From Marshall’s to the Italian “industrial districts”: A brief critical reconstruction. European Planning Studies, 15(3), 329–338.
Bocken, N., & Short, S. (2016). Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: Experiences and opportunities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 288–301.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Ellen Macarthur Foundation. (2015). The circular economy | Definition & model explained. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved February 20, 2024, from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview.
Frosch, R., & Gallopoulos, N. (1989). Sustainable Industry Community. Scientific American, 261, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144.
Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2013). The structuration of socio-technical regimes: Conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 42(4), 856–870.
Ganzevles, J., Potting, J., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Evaluation of green deals for a circular economy. PBL Publishers.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257–1274.
Linder, M., & Williander, M. (2015). Circular business model innovation: Inherent uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 1–7.
Pavel, S. (2018). Circular economy: The beauty of circularity in value chain. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(4), 584–598. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.01.04.52.
Pemerintah Kota Bandung. (2022, September 21). Lampiran Peraturan Daerah (Perda) Kota Bandung Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Bandung.
Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain. PBL Publishers.
Scerri, A., James, P., & Magee, L. (2015). Urban sustainability in theory and practice: Circles of sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 11(1), 101–114.
Schoeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2018). The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77-95.
Sekretariat Pembangunan Rendah Karbon Indonesia. (2020). 7 Proyek Implementasi Pembangunan Rendah Karbon Indonesia.
TPA Sarimukti “Overload”, pengolahan sampah Bandung Raya belum optimal. (2024, October 21). Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nusantara/2024/10/21/tpa-sarimukti-overload-pengolahan-sampah-bandung-raya-belum-optimal.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah. (2018).
Wysokinska, Z. (2016). The “New” Environmental Policy of The European Union: A Path to Development of a Circular Economy and Mitigation of The Negative Effects of Climate Change. Comparative Economic Research. 19(3), 5-22.
This post has already been read 339 times!