Marriage factor and women’s employability in India: a macro analysis

Author: and
Key words: , , ,
Issue: Volume 7, Issue 2, 2013

Abstract


This study attempts to carry out an empirical investigation regarding the role of marriage as a structural constraint to women’s employability in India. The National Sample Survey data based analysis shows that the heterogeneity of women’s employment is significantly controlled by their orientation to work where marriage acts as an important mediating factor. Significant differences are observed between the workforce participation of currently married and never married women across different educational attainment and socio-demographic segments. However, the way marriage operates as a formal barrier to women’s workability merely depends on the historically available opportunities and constraints experienced by them. 

Full text


Permalink (doi)



Authors Affiliations


Shamindra Nath Roy*, Ritwika Mukherjee
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
*Corresponding author. Email: writeshami@gmail.com

References

Banerjee, N 1998, ̒Whatever happened to the dreams of modernity? The Nehruvian era and women’s position̕, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 33, no. 17.

Crompton, R & Harris, F 1998, ̒Explaining women’s employment patterns: ‘Orientation to Work’ revisited̕, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 118-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591266

Crompton, R & Sanderson, K 1990, Gendered Jobs and Social Change, Unwin Hyman, London.

Ghosh, J 2009, Never done and poorly paid: women’s work in globalizing India, New Delhi, Women Unlimited.

Ginn, J, Arber, S, Brannen, J, Dale, A, Dex, S, Elias, P, Moss, P, Pahl, J, Roberts, C & Rubery, J 1996, ‘Feminist Fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women’s employment’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 167-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591122

Hakim, C 1991, ̒Grateful slaves and self- made women: fact and fantasy in women’s work orientations̕, European Sociological Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 101-21.

Hakim, C 1992, ̒Explaining Trends in Occupational Segregation: The Measurement, Causes, and Consequences of the Sexual Division of Labour̕, European Sociological Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 127-52.

Hakim, C 1995, ̒Five feminist myths about women’s employment̕, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 429-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591850

Jain, D 1985, ̒Domestic work: its implication for enumeration on women’s work and employment̕ in K Saradamoni (ed), Women, work and society, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata.

Mazumdar, I 2007, Women workers and globalization: emergent contradictions in India, Stree, Kolkata.

Mazumdar, I 2008, ̒Women’s unpaid labour in neo-liberal India̕, Indian Historical Review, vol. 35, no. 2.

Morrison, DG 1972, ̒Upper Bounds for Correlations between Binary Outcomes and Probabilistic Predictions̕, Journal of American Statistical Association, vol. 67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481207

Pindyck, RS & Rubinfeld, DL 1998, Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th edn, Irwin Mcgraw-Hill.

Retherford, RD & Choe, MK 1993, Statistical Models for Causal Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118033135

This post has already been read 2316 times!