Heritage advantages vs. economic constraints in the sustainable development framing: A study on social perception in Apuseni Mountains Natural Park

Author: , , , , , , and
Key words: , , , , , , ,
Issue: Volume 13, Issue 2, 2019


In a natural park, tourism is seen as an economic activity that can easily bring many benefits. Apuseni Natural Park (ANP)was chosen as a case study because it impacts communities (and especially moți) which have preserved their culture and traditions, coming from ancient times, in an area with remarkable natural and anthropogenic tourist resources. The aim of the study is to analyse the perception of local communities (endogenous), and visitors (exogenous), in order to highlight the heritage, economic advantages, and constraints in the natural park. The research is based on survey method and a number of spatial analysis tools, GIS, bibliographic sources, cartographic data mining, and field observations. The results show that local communities perceive in a high ratio the advantages of heritage preservation, linking them to the improvement of their life and less the disadvantages on the local economy. A more significant contrast in perception is revealed by tourists, who think that a national park has many advantages and constraints, the last ones accounting for the possible loss of functioning of the destination. In the frame of the recognised attractiveness of the ANP, the study suggests the need for a continuous monitoring process and the adoption of a receptive administration for each area and every actor involved.

Full text

Permalink (doi)

Authors Affiliations

Gabriela Manea*, Laura Maria Orbu, Elena Matei, Mihaela Preda, Iuliana Vijulie, Roxana Cuculici, Octavian Cocoș, Alexandra Zaharia
University of Bucharest, Romania
* Corresponding author.
Email: maneagabriela2002@yahoo.com


Abrudan I.V. and Turnock D., (1998), “A rural development strategy for the Apuseni Mountains, Romania”, GeoJournal, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 319-336.
Abrudan, I.V. and Turnock, D. (2000), “Romania’s Apuseni Mountains: Safeguarding a cultural heritage”, GeoJournal, no. 50, vol. 2/3, p. 285-304.
Almeida-García, F., Peláez-Fernández, M.Á., Balbuena-Vázquez, A. and Cortés-Macias, R. (2016), “Residents’ perceptions of tourism development in Benalmádena (Spain)”, Tourism Management, vol. 54, p. 259-274.
Angelevska – Najdeska, K. and Rakicevik, G. (2012), “Planning of sustainable tourism development”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 44, p. 210-220.
Ap, J. (1992), “Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts”, Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 665-690.
Bleahu, M., Bordea, S. and Borza, Al. (1963), Munții Apuseni, ONT Publishing House.
Budeanu, A., Miller, G., Moscardo, G. and Ooi, C.S. (2016), “Sustainable tourism, progress, challenges and opportunities: an introduction”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 111, p. 285-294.
D’ Mello, C., Chang, L.Ch., Pillai, S.K.B., Kamat, K., Zimmermann, F.M. and Weiermair, K., (2016), “Comparison of multi-stakeholder perception of tourism sustainability in Goa”, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Systems, vol. 9, p. 1-13.
Domínguez – Gómez, J.A. and González-Gómez, T. (2017), “Analysing stakeholders’ perceptions of golf-course-based tourism: A proposal for developing sustainable tourism projects”, Tourism Management, vol. 63, p. 135-143.
Foris, D., 2014, “Study Regarding a New Dimension of Tourism Phenomenon – The Political – Administrative Dimension”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 143, p. 1078–1082.
Hardy, A. and Pearson, L.J. (2017), “Examining stakeholder group specificity: An innovative sustainable tourism approach”, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, vol. 8, p. 247-258.
Jarvie, M.E. 1987, Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development, viewed 5 May 2018, https://cutt.ly/PePb4uA.
Linc, R., Nistor, S. and Turnock, D. (2011), “Aspects regarding the environmental impact of tourism activities in the Apuseni National Park. Romania”, Analele Universității din Oradea – Seria Geografie, vol. 2, p. 340-353.
Lyon, A., Hunter-Jones, P. and Warnaby, G. (2017), “Are we any closer to sustainable development? Listening to active stakeholder discourses of tourism development in the waterberg biosphere reserve, South Africa”, Tourism Management, vol. 61, p. 234-247.
Main, D., 2018, In Transylvania, A Fierce Battle Over Gold and Roman History, National Geographic, viewed 20 August 2019, https://cutt.ly/xePnwmo.
Matei, E. (2016), Turism şi dezvoltare durabilă, Bucharest, Universitară Publishing House.
Matei, E., Dumitrache, L., Manea, G., Vijulie, I., Tîrlă, L. and Matei, D. (2013), Urban sustainable development of the Romanian small towns in the local communities and authorities’ perception, SGEM Conference proceedings, vol. 3, Bulgaria.
Matei, E., Dumitrache, L., Nae, M., Vijulie, I. and Onetiu, A. (2011), Evaluating sustainability of urban development of the small towns in Romania, SGEM Conference proceedings, vol. 3, Bulgaria.
Matei, E., Stăncioiu, F.A., Vijulie, I., Manea, G, and Cuculici, R. (2019), “Attractiveness and Competitiveness in the Romanian Carpathian Mountains Destinations: A study of Perception of Generation Y”, Journal of Environmental and Tourism Analyses, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5-18.
NA, 2009, Parcul Natural Apuseni, premiat de Comisia Europeana, viewed 12 May 2018, https://cutt.ly/AePbKdS.
Surd, V., (1992), “Sistemele de asezari din Muntii Apuseni”, Geographia, Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, vol. 1-2, p. 9-20.
UNEP, (1972), Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, United Nations Environment Programme.
UNEP, (1992), United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 – 14 June, Agenda 21, viewed 18 August 2019, https://cutt.ly/JePnpp1.
UN-HABITAT, 2002, World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, viewed 18 August 2019, https://cutt.ly/SePnF6B.
Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M. and Chiu, K.K.S. (2016), “Multi-attribute approach to sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 116, no. 4, p. 777-800.

This post has already been read 2891 times!

About journal

Title: Human Geographies - Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography
ISSN online: 2067-2284
ISSN print: 1843-6587
Imprint: University of Bucharest
Frequency: Biannual (May&November)
First volume: 1/2007
Current volume: 17/2023
Language: English
Indexed in: SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO (SocINDEX), ProQuest (Social Science Journals, SciTech Journals, Natural Science Journals), Index Copernicus, National Technical Information Service (NTiS), Bodleian Libraries, ExLibris SFX, DOAJ, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Library, Google Scholar, Ulrich
Creative Commons License


Prof. dr. Liliana Dumitrache
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography- Human and Economic Geography Department, 1 Nicolae Balcescu Av., 010041, Bucharest, Romania

Dr. Daniela Dumbrăveanu
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography- Human and Economic Geography Department, 1 Nicolae Balcescu Av., 010041, Bucharest, Romania

Dr. Mariana Nae
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography- Human and Economic Geography Department, 1 Nicolae Balcescu Av., 010041, Bucharest, Romania

Dr. Gabriel Simion
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography- Human and Economic Geography Department, 1 Nicolae Balcescu Av., 010041, Bucharest, Romania

SCImago Journal & Country Rank